Update QDs to QL 1

action_msgs/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This document is a declaration of software quality for the `action_msgs` package
 
 # `action_msgs` Quality Declaration
 
-The package `action_msgs` claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category.
+The package `action_msgs` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category as long as it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.
 
-Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 2 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
+Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
 
 ## Version Policy [1]
 
@@ -70,13 +70,15 @@ The license for `action_msgs` is Apache 2.0, the type is declared in the [packag
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has a license statement.
 
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/)
+
 ### Copyright Statements [3.iv]
 
 The copyright holders each provide a statement of copyright in each source code file in `action_msgs`.
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has at least one copyright statement.
 
-The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_bionic_amd64/lastBuild/)
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/)
 
 ## Testing [4]
 
@@ -86,10 +88,10 @@ The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__
 
 ### Direct Runtime ROS Dependencies [5.i]/[5.ii]
 
-`action_msgs` has the following runtime ROS dependencies, which are at or above QL 2:
-* `builtin_interfaces`: [QL 2](../builtin_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
-* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QL 2](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
-* `unique_identifier_msgs`: [QL 2](https://github.com/ros2/unique_identifier_msgs/tree/master/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+`action_msgs` has the following runtime ROS dependencies, which are at **Quality Level 1**:
+* `builtin_interfaces`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](../builtin_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+* `unique_identifier_msgs`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](https://github.com/ros2/unique_identifier_msgs/tree/master/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
 
 It has several "buildtool" dependencies, which do not affect the resulting quality of the package, because they do not contribute to the public library API.
 

action_msgs/README.md

@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ For more information about ROS 2 interfaces, see [index.ros2.org](https://index.
 * [CancelGoal](srv/CancelGoal.srv): Cancel Goals either by id and/or timestamp.
 
 ## Quality Declaration
-This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.
+This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.

builtin_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This document is a declaration of software quality for the `builtin_interfaces`
 
 # `builtin_interfaces` Quality Declaration
 
-The package `builtin_interfaces` claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category.
+The package `builtin_interfaces` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category as long as it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.
 
-Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 2 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
+Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
 
 ## Version Policy [1]
 
@@ -70,13 +70,15 @@ The license for `builtin_interfaces` is Apache 2.0, the type is declared in the
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has a license statement.
 
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
+
 ### Copyright Statements [3.iv]
 
 The copyright holders each provide a statement of copyright in each source code file in `builtin_interfaces`.
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has at least one copyright statement.
 
-The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_bionic_amd64/lastBuild/)
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
 
 ## Testing [4]
 
@@ -86,8 +88,8 @@ The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__
 
 ### Direct Runtime ROS Dependencies [5.i]/[5.ii]
 
-`builtin_interfaces` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at or above QL 2:
-* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QL 2](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+`builtin_interfaces` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at **Quality Level 1**:
+* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
 
 It has several "buildtool" dependencies, which do not affect the resulting quality of the package, because they do not contribute to the public library API.
 

builtin_interfaces/README.md

@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ For more information about ROS 2 interfaces, see [index.ros2.org](https://index.
 * [Time](msg/Time.msg): Describes a point in time, composed of seconds and nanoseconds components.
 
 ## Quality Declaration
-This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.
+This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.

composition_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This document is a declaration of software quality for the `composition_interfac
 
 # `composition_interfaces` Quality Declaration
 
-The package `composition_interfaces` claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category.
+The package `composition_interfaces` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category as long as it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.
 
-Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 2 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
+Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
 
 ## Version Policy [1]
 
@@ -70,13 +70,15 @@ The license for `composition_interfaces` is Apache 2.0, the type is declared in
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has a license statement.
 
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
+
 ### Copyright Statements [3.iv]
 
 The copyright holders each provide a statement of copyright in each source code file in `composition_interfaces`.
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has at least one copyright statement.
 
-The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_bionic_amd64/lastBuild/)
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
 
 ## Testing [4]
 
@@ -86,8 +88,8 @@ The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__
 
 ### Direct Runtime ROS Dependencies [5.i]/[5.ii]
 
-`composition_interfaces` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at or above QL 2:
-* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QL 2](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+`composition_interfaces` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at **Quality Level 1**:
+* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
 
 It has several "buildtool" dependencies, which do not affect the resulting quality of the package, because they do not contribute to the public library API.
 

composition_interfaces/README.md

@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ For more information about ROS 2 interfaces, see [index.ros2.org](https://index.
 * [UnloadNode](srv/UnloadNode.srv): Unload a specified node by its id.
 
 ## Quality Declaration
-This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.
+This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.

lifecycle_msgs/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This document is a declaration of software quality for the `lifecycle_msgs` pack
 
 # `lifecycle_msgs` Quality Declaration
 
-The package `lifecycle_msgs` claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category.
+The package `lifecycle_msgs` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category as long as it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.
 
-Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 2 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
+Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
 
 ## Version Policy [1]
 
@@ -70,13 +70,15 @@ The license for `lifecycle_msgs` is Apache 2.0, the type is declared in the [pac
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has a license statement.
 
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/)
+
 ### Copyright Statements [3.iv]
 
 The copyright holders each provide a statement of copyright in each source code file in `lifecycle_msgs`.
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has at least one copyright statement.
 
-The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_bionic_amd64/lastBuild/)
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/)
 
 ## Testing [4]
 
@@ -86,8 +88,8 @@ The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__
 
 ### Direct Runtime ROS Dependencies [5.i]/[5.ii]
 
-`lifecycle_msgs` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at or above QL 2:
-* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QL 2](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+`lifecycle_msgs` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at **Quality Level 1**:
+* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
 
 It has several "buildtool" dependencies, which do not affect the resulting quality of the package, because they do not contribute to the public library API.
 

lifecycle_msgs/README.md

@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ For more information about ROS 2 interfaces, see [index.ros2.org](https://index.
 * [GetState](srv/GetState.srv): Request the current lifecycle state of this node.
 
 ## Quality Declaration
-This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.
+This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.

rcl_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rcl_interfaces` pack
 
 # `rcl_interfaces` Quality Declaration
 
-The package `rcl_interfaces` claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category.
+The package `rcl_interfaces` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category as long as it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.
 
-Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 2 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
+Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
 
 ## Version Policy [1]
 
@@ -70,12 +70,16 @@ The license for `rcl_interfaces` is Apache 2.0, the type is declared in the `pac
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has a license statement.
 
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
+
 ### Copyright Statements [3.iv]
 
 The copyright holders each provide a statement of copyright in each source code file in `rcl_interfaces`.
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has at least one copyright statement.
 
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
+
 ## Testing [4]
 
 `rcl_interfaces` is a package providing strictly message and service definitions and therefore does not require associated tests and has no coverage or performance requirements.
@@ -84,9 +88,9 @@ There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has at lea
 
 ### Direct Runtime ROS Dependencies [5.i]/[5.ii]
 
-`rcl_interfaces` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at or above QL 2:
-* `builtin_interfaces`: [QL 2](../builtin_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
-* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QL 2](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+`rcl_interfaces` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at **Quality Level 1**:
+* `builtin_interfaces`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](../builtin_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
 
 It has several "buildtool" dependencies, which do not affect the resulting quality of the package, because they do not contribute to the public library API.
 

rcl_interfaces/README.md

@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ The ROS API for a node will be as follows inside the node's namespace.
 * [SetParametersAtomically](srv/SetParametersAtomically.srv): Add or change all parameters in a list or none at all.
 
 ## Quality Declaration
-This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.
+This package claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category, see the [Quality Declaration](QUALITY_DECLARATION.md) for more details.

rosgraph_msgs/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rosgraph_msgs` packa
 
 # `rosgraph_msgs` Quality Declaration
 
-The package `rosgraph_msgs` claims to be in the **Quality Level 2** category.
+The package `rosgraph_msgs` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category as long as it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.
 
-Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 2 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
+Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
 
 ## Version Policy [1]
 
@@ -70,13 +70,15 @@ The license for `rosgraph_msgs` is Apache 2.0, the type is declared in the [pack
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has a license statement.
 
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
+
 ### Copyright Statements [3.iv]
 
 The copyright holders each provide a statement of copyright in each source code file in `rosgraph_msgs`.
 
 There is an automated test which runs a linter that ensures each file has at least one copyright statement.
 
-The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_bionic_amd64/lastBuild/)
+The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Rpr/job/Rpr__rcl_interfaces__ubuntu_focal_amd64/lastCompletedBuild/testReport)
 
 ## Testing [4]
 
@@ -86,9 +88,9 @@ The nightly test can be found at [here](http://build.ros2.org/view/Epr/job/Epr__
 
 ### Direct Runtime ROS Dependencies [5.i]/[5.ii]
 
-`rosgraph_msgs` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at or above QL 2:
-* `builtin_interfaces`: [QL 2](../builtin_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
-* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QL 2](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+`rosgraph_msgs` has the following ROS dependencies, which are at **Quality Level 1**:
+* `builtin_interfaces`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](../builtin_interfaces/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
+* `rosidl_default_runtime`: [QUALITY DECLARATION](https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_defaults/tree/master/rosidl_default_runtime/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md)
 
 It has several "buildtool" dependencies, which do not affect the resulting quality of the package, because they do not contribute to the public library API.