Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editing Share Access Control, random user/group selected as default #775

Closed
modelrockettier opened this issue Aug 4, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@modelrockettier
Copy link

When I view a share's access control, everything is correct (user:root, group:root, perm:755), but when I hit edit, the perms stay correct, but the selected user becomes sync and the selected group becomes wheel.

It would be nice if these reflected the actual user and group. This would be especially nice when you only want to change the user or group, but not both because right now you have to re-select the proper user AND group.

Also, the user and group lists are currently listed in a random order (not sorted and the order is different from what appears in /etc/passwd and /etc/group), which takes longer to select the item I'm looking for (though browser tricks like typing the first couple letters sometimes help get around this).

Rockstor 3.8-3.

@schakrava
Copy link
Member

Thanks for providing the right amount of detail @modelrockettier

@modelrockettier
Copy link
Author

I just updated to 3.8-4 and this is still present.

Mchakravartula added a commit to Mchakravartula/rockstor-core that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2015
schakrava added a commit to Mchakravartula/rockstor-core that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2015
schakrava added a commit to Mchakravartula/rockstor-core that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2015
schakrava added a commit to Mchakravartula/rockstor-core that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2015
schakrava added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2015
…ntrol

Display correct values in edit share access control. #775
@schakrava
Copy link
Member

Fixed by #778

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants