You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, following robotology/community#167 we are now using iKinGazeCtrl --head_version 2.0 in Lisbon. However, I noticed that gravityCompensator and wholeBodyDynamics still use the "old" option name --headV2.
Perhaps it makes sense to make the option --head_version x.y on the two latter modules as well? If you want, I can prepare the corresponding PRs in icub-main and robots-configuration. If not, feel free to close this issue. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…--headV2
Replaced the option "--headV2" with "--head_version 2.0" (or 2.5), to be consistent with the recent change in iKinGazeCtrl (robotology#391).
If the option "--head_version" is absent or has an invalid argument, the head v1 model is used and a message is printed.
/cc robotology#285robotology#405
Prepared a PR for review: #406. If that is merged, then I'll send a corresponding PR in robots-configuration too (which will affect only our robot iCubStartup.xml).
Hi, following robotology/community#167 we are now using
iKinGazeCtrl --head_version 2.0
in Lisbon. However, I noticed thatgravityCompensator
andwholeBodyDynamics
still use the "old" option name--headV2
.Perhaps it makes sense to make the option
--head_version x.y
on the two latter modules as well? If you want, I can prepare the corresponding PRs inicub-main
androbots-configuration
. If not, feel free to close this issue. :)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: