Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Adjustment Cost to Synthetic Fuel/Gas Technologies and adapt adjustment cost of electrolysis and centralized heat pumps #1823

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 9 additions & 2 deletions core/datainput.gms
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1164,11 +1164,13 @@ loop(ttot$(ttot.val ge 2005),
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,'dac') = 0.25;
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,'oae_ng') = 0.25;
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,'oae_el') = 0.25;
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,'geohe') = 0.33;
$ifthen.cm_subsec_model_steel "%cm_subsec_model_steel%" == "processes"
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,"bfcc") = 0.05;
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,"idrcc") = 0.05;
$endif.cm_subsec_model_steel
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,"elh2") = 0.33;
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,"MeOH") = 0.5;
p_adj_seed_te(ttot,regi,"h22ch4") = 0.5;

*RP: for comparison of different technologies:
*** pm_conv_cap_2_MioLDV <- 650 # The world has slightly below 800million cars in 2005 (IEA TECO2), so with a global vm_cap of 1.2, this gives ~650
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1196,7 +1198,6 @@ $endif.cm_subsec_model_steel
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"spv") = 0.15;
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"windon") = 0.25;
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"windoff") = 0.35;
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"geohe") = 0.6;
$ifthen.cm_subsec_model_steel "%cm_subsec_model_steel%" == "processes"
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"bfcc") = 1.0;
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"idrcc") = 1.0;
Expand All @@ -1207,6 +1208,12 @@ $endif.cm_subsec_model_steel
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,'oae_el') = 0.8;
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,teGrid) = 0.3;
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,teStor) = 0.05;

p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"elh2") = 0.75;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure about this - the coal2h/bio2h have lower adjustment costs - I would think that electrolyzers seem a cleaner/more modular/less "heavy chemistry" technology than coal2h/bio2h?
so I would only go to 0.5 or so.
but maybe I am overlooking something?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright. I see the point. I went for coefficient 0.5 (double default) and seed 0.5 (half default). That should be fine. I would not go lower for now as the it needed some increase with the current CAPEX to not be above feasibility benchmarks for 2030, which we saw, for instance, in Ariadne. We might want to reassess after potential CAPEX updates for electrolysis and the BtL/GtL etc. technologies.

p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"MeOH") = 0.5;
p_adj_coeff(ttot,regi,"h22ch4") = 0.5;


);

***Rescaling adj seed and coeff if adj cost multiplier switches are on
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions modules/39_CCU/on/sets.gms
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ enty(enty_ccu39) = YES;
te(te_ccu39) = YES;
se2se(se2se_ccu39) = YES;
teSe2rlf(teCCU2rlf) = YES;
teAdj(te_ccu39) = YES;

*** EOF ./modules/39_CCU/on/sets.gms

Loading