Update workflows #227
Merged
Update workflows #227
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Aviator Changeset actions:
|
Current Aviator status
This PR was merged manually (without Aviator). Merging manually can negatively impact the performance of the queue. Consider using Aviator next time.
See the real-time status of this PR on the
Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension
to see the status of your PR within GitHub.
|
|
Review changes with |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Please follow naming conventions! 😿 |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the 📝 WalkthroughPrzegląd zmianWalkthroughWprowadzono nowy plik workflow GitHub Actions o nazwie Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Click here to review and test in web IDE: |
Przewodnik Recenzenta przez SourceryTen pull request wprowadza nowy przepływ pracy GitHub Actions do równoległego uruchamiania testów i przesyłania danych o pokryciu kodu do Coveralls. Diagram sekwencji dla równoległego przepływu pokrycia testówsequenceDiagram
participant GH as GitHub
participant J1 as Test Job 1
participant J2 as Test Job 2
participant CV as Coveralls
participant F as Finish Job
GH->>J1: Trigger on push/PR
GH->>J2: Trigger on push/PR
par Parallel execution
J1->>J1: Run test coverage 1
J1->>CV: Upload coverage data (flag: run-1)
and
J2->>J2: Run test coverage 2
J2->>CV: Upload coverage data (flag: run-2)
end
GH->>F: Start finish job
F->>CV: Mark parallel coverage complete
Note over CV: Combine coverage reports
Zmiany na poziomie plików
Wskazówki i poleceniaInterakcja z Sourcery
Dostosowywanie doświadczeniaUzyskaj dostęp do pulpitu nawigacyjnego, aby:
Uzyskiwanie pomocy
Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow to run tests and upload coverage data to Coveralls in parallel. Sequence diagram for parallel test coverage workflowsequenceDiagram
participant GH as GitHub
participant J1 as Test Job 1
participant J2 as Test Job 2
participant CV as Coveralls
participant F as Finish Job
GH->>J1: Trigger on push/PR
GH->>J2: Trigger on push/PR
par Parallel execution
J1->>J1: Run test coverage 1
J1->>CV: Upload coverage data (flag: run-1)
and
J2->>J2: Run test coverage 2
J2->>CV: Upload coverage data (flag: run-2)
end
GH->>F: Start finish job
F->>CV: Mark parallel coverage complete
Note over CV: Combine coverage reports
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Files
|
|
Skipping bot pull request creation because the queue is empty and this pull request is up to date with |
|
Merge ProtectionsYour pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid. 🟢 Do not merge outdated PRsWonderful, this rule succeeded.Make sure PRs are almost up to date before merging
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cześć @reisene - przejrzałem Twoje zmiany - oto moje uwagi:
Uwagi ogólne:
- Wygląda na to, że występuje błąd TypeError w odznace PR, który należy rozwiązać przed scaleniem. Proszę naprawić problem z konfiguracją odznaki.
- Rozważ aktualizację do Node.js 18.x lub 20.x LTS, ponieważ Node.js 16.x zbliża się do końca swojego cyklu życia.
- Proszę dodać komentarze dokumentacyjne w pliku workflow wyjaśniające, co dokładnie obejmują test-coverage-1 i test-coverage-2, aby ułatwić przyszłe utrzymanie.
Oto, co sprawdziłem podczas przeglądu
- 🟢 Problemy ogólne: wszystko wygląda dobrze
- 🟢 Bezpieczeństwo: wszystko wygląda dobrze
- 🟢 Testy: wszystko wygląda dobrze
- 🟢 Złożoność: wszystko wygląda dobrze
- 🟢 Dokumentacja: wszystko wygląda dobrze
Sourcery jest darmowy dla projektów open source - jeśli podobają Ci się nasze recenzje, rozważ ich udostępnienie ✨
Original comment in English
Hey @reisene - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- There appears to be a TypeError in the PR badge that needs to be addressed before merging. Please fix the badge configuration issue.
- Consider upgrading to Node.js 18.x or 20.x LTS as Node.js 16.x is approaching end of life.
- Please add documentation comments in the workflow file explaining what test-coverage-1 and test-coverage-2 specifically cover to aid in future maintenance.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
🚀 CodeThreat Security Scan Completed for HulajDusza-serwisHello Team, Great news! We've just completed a thorough security scan for HulajDusza-serwis, and here's what we found: ⏱ Quick Overview
🛠 Detailed Vulnerability AnalysisWe've identified vulnerabilities across the codebase. Here's a detailed look:
🔗 Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Insightspackage-lock.jsonSeverity Summary: Critical: 5 High: 16 Medium: 14 Low: 5
📈 Next Steps & Full ReportTo dive deeper, click here to view the full report. It's essential to review these findings and plan the necessary fixes. If any of the critical/high issues need more discussion, let's set up a quick meeting to strategize our next steps. 🔒 Security isn't just a feature; it's a responsibility. Let's keep our codebase rock solid! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Podsumowanie przez Sourcery
CI:
Original summary in English
Summary by Sourcery
CI:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Nowe funkcje
Testy
Narzędzia CI/CD