-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for ACL commands #1538 #1602
Conversation
Good first draft. Let's move Can we also make the Re rules abstraction: I think it makes sense to provide an args object to provide rules. |
In preparation for Lettuce 6.1 M1, I'd like to move this change to M2 so that we can ship 6.1 M1 in the next days. |
ccc5f6a
to
34bde15
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1602 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 78.77% 78.30% -0.48%
- Complexity 6443 6509 +66
============================================
Files 481 487 +6
Lines 21735 22061 +326
Branches 2377 2412 +35
============================================
+ Hits 17122 17275 +153
- Misses 3525 3671 +146
- Partials 1088 1115 +27
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
cc83288
to
232fbe7
Compare
232fbe7
to
a12d34c
Compare
I've made some fixes according to the first review |
* @param <V> Value type. | ||
* @author Mikhael Sokolov | ||
*/ | ||
public class EnumListOutput<K, V, E extends Enum<E>> extends CommandOutput<K, V, List<E>> implements StreamingOutput<E> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be rather an EnumSet
. I will take care of this during the merge.
Thank you for your contribution. That's merged and polished now. I removed |
Draft PR for ACL commands API.
My main concern - should we provide higher abstractions for rules?