DFBUGS-1420: rbd: use correct radosnamespace

[iPraveenParihar]

Describe what this PR does

Issue: When an RBD image is created in a non-default namespace, the OMAP data for the PersistentVolume fails to regenerate because it still attempts to locate the RBD image in the default namespace.

This commit ensures the correct radosNamespace is retrieved from the ceph-csi-config.

Signed-off-by: Praveen M m.praveen@ibm.com
(cherry picked from commit 8a66575)

Future concerns

List items that are not part of the PR and do not impact it's
functionality, but are work items that can be taken up subsequently.

Checklist:

• Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
• Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
• Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next major release.
• Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
• Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

---

Show available bot commands

These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:

• /retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the <job-name> after unrelated
  failure (please report the failure too!)

[openshift-ci-robot]

@iPraveenParihar: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-1420](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-1420), which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "odf-4.18" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Describe what this PR does

Issue: When an RBD image is created in a non-default namespace, the OMAP data for the PersistentVolume fails to regenerate because it still attempts to locate the RBD image in the default namespace.

This commit ensures the correct radosNamespace is retrieved from the ceph-csi-config.

Signed-off-by: Praveen M m.praveen@ibm.com
(cherry picked from commit 8a66575)

Future concerns

List items that are not part of the PR and do not impact it's
functionality, but are work items that can be taken up subsequently.

Checklist:

• Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
• Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
• Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next major release.
• Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
• Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

---

Show available bot commands

These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:

• /retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the <job-name> after unrelated
  failure (please report the failure too!)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[Madhu-1]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: iPraveenParihar, Madhu-1

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Madhu-1,iPraveenParihar]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Rakshith-R]

/jirra-refresh
/refresh

[iPraveenParihar]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@iPraveenParihar: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-1420](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-1420), which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (odf-4.18) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.18)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @nehaberry

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: nehaberry.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@iPraveenParihar: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-1420](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-1420), which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (odf-4.18) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.18)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @nehaberry

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@iPraveenParihar: [Jira Issue DFBUGS-1420](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-1420): All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• red-hat-storage/ceph-csi#456

[Jira Issue DFBUGS-1420](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-1420) has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Describe what this PR does

Issue: When an RBD image is created in a non-default namespace, the OMAP data for the PersistentVolume fails to regenerate because it still attempts to locate the RBD image in the default namespace.

This commit ensures the correct radosNamespace is retrieved from the ceph-csi-config.

Signed-off-by: Praveen M m.praveen@ibm.com
(cherry picked from commit 8a66575)

Future concerns

List items that are not part of the PR and do not impact it's
functionality, but are work items that can be taken up subsequently.

Checklist:

• Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
• Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
• Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next major release.
• Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
• Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

---

Show available bot commands

These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:

• /retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the <job-name> after unrelated
  failure (please report the failure too!)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.