-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RCORE-2134 touch up the GHA release process based on the first full run #7730
Changes from 3 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1,16 +1,18 @@ | ||||||
The core release process is automated with github [actions](https://github.com/realm/realm-core/actions) | ||||||
|
||||||
1. Run the prepare-release action. | ||||||
- input the base branch that you would like to make a release from (usually this will be "master"). | ||||||
- input the release version (eg. "10.14.7") | ||||||
1. Go to the prepare-release [action](https://github.com/realm/realm-core/actions/workflows/prepare-release.yml) and click the "Run workflow" dropdown. | ||||||
- Input the base branch that you would like to make a release from (usually this will be "master"). | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
- Input the release version (eg. "10.14.7") | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nit: Update the version description on line 10 of |
||||||
|
||||||
2. This will create a PR, which you should look over and get someone else on the team to review. Verify the changelog by checking the PR description which has a list of commits since the last tag was made. If any changes are required, commit them to this PR's branch. | ||||||
|
||||||
3. When ready, merge the PR. You can squash if there are only "prepare release" changes, but use a "merge-commit" strategy if there are functional changes added manually to the PR. On merge, the "make-release" action will run. This takes care of: | ||||||
- Making a tag | ||||||
- Publishing the release on Github | ||||||
- Updating the Changelog | ||||||
- Announcing the release in the #appx-releases slack channel | ||||||
3. When ready, merge the PR. You can squash if there are only "prepare release" changes, but use a "merge-commit" strategy if there are functional changes added manually to the PR (note that if using a merge strategy, the last commit after merge will be the one tagged, so you may want to reorder the commits so that the 'prepare' commit comes last). On merge, the "make-release" action will run. This will: | ||||||
- Make a tag | ||||||
- Publish the release on Github | ||||||
- Open a PR to update the Changelog with the new template section | ||||||
- Announce the release in the #appx-releases slack channel | ||||||
|
||||||
4. Find the newly generated PR that adds the new changelog section. Approve it and merge it. | ||||||
|
||||||
## Previous process | ||||||
|
||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need any of the special abilities of the REALM_CI_PAT for this action. We should be fine with the default GITHUB_TOKEN (docs). One difference is that further github actions cannot be triggered by jobs using the GITHUB_TOKEN, but this is not an issue because the next step in the release process is to approve and manually merge the generated PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's right - if you only work in the same repository and don't need subsequent workflows to trigger for any of the work
GITHUB_TOKEN
does then I'd say it's the best choice.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for confirming Yavor!