-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RLlib] CQL change hparams and data reading strategy #27451
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | ||
cloud_id: {{env["ANYSCALE_CLOUD_ID"]}} | ||
region: us-west-2 | ||
|
||
max_workers: 0 | ||
|
||
head_node_type: | ||
name: head_node | ||
instance_type: g3.4xlarge | ||
|
||
worker_node_types: | ||
- name: worker_node | ||
instance_type: m5.xlarge | ||
min_workers: 0 | ||
max_workers: 0 | ||
use_spot: false | ||
|
||
aws: | ||
BlockDeviceMappings: | ||
- DeviceName: /dev/sda1 | ||
Ebs: | ||
VolumeSize: 500 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this necessary? This is offline RL so more number of iterations should have worked equally here. If this is necessary something does not make sense, if it wasn't necessary we should remove this hparam and instead increase timesteps_total to be consistent with other learning tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait this parameter controls the logging frequency. I increased it so that we don't run too many unnecessary evaluations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's not just that, but also the training time spent per iteration. so you keep running the same training_step() function until that timing requirement is met. In other words you keep taking gradient updates until that time is reached.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We chatted offline and my concern was more about reproducibility. These nits are not merge blockers. So please merge if it's the only thing holding this back.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will open a separate pr that addresses this issue across all release tests and environments