Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downgrade gvisor-tap-vsock to v0.7.5 #8103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Nino-K
Copy link
Member

@Nino-K Nino-K commented Jan 16, 2025

As part of the 1.17.0 release, we upgraded the gvisor-tap-vsock library to version v0.8.1. However, this version has caused issues with DNS resolution behind VPNs and other name resolution problems. To address these issues, we are planning to release a patch, and this downgrade is part of that solution.

Related to: #8055

@Nino-K Nino-K force-pushed the downgrade-gvisor-tap-vsock branch from ca86fa5 to 6b6bbfb Compare January 17, 2025 00:41
jandubois
jandubois previously approved these changes Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jandubois jandubois left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM (as long as CI will be all green too)

As part of the 1.17.0 release, we upgraded the gvisor-tap-vsock library to version v0.8.1.
However, this version has caused issues with DNS resolution behind VPNs and other name resolution problems.
To address these issues, we are planning to release a patch, and this downgrade is part of that solution.

Signed-off-by: Nino Kodabande <nkodabande@suse.com>
@Nino-K Nino-K force-pushed the downgrade-gvisor-tap-vsock branch from 31c02ca to ea1a76d Compare January 17, 2025 00:48
@Nino-K Nino-K enabled auto-merge January 17, 2025 00:55
@Nino-K Nino-K merged commit 3b0c508 into main Jan 17, 2025
29 checks passed
@Nino-K Nino-K deleted the downgrade-gvisor-tap-vsock branch January 17, 2025 01:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants