Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove SKU ACS-SN4280 #3

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Remove SKU ACS-SN4280 #3

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

ram25794
Copy link
Owner

Why I did it

Every ACS-.....SKU is expected to have ingress_lossy pool but SKU ACS-SN4280 does not contain it. So removing the ACS SKU to make it compliant.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Removed the symlinks in Mellanox-SN4280-O28 folder and added the required files.

How to verify it

Generated config using Mellanox-SN4280-O28 SKU and tested on the device

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

Signed-off-by: ram25794 <ssingamala@nvidia.com>
@ram25794 ram25794 force-pushed the Remove_SKU_ACS-SN4280 branch from 16137bd to 016973e Compare February 14, 2025 19:17
Signed-off-by: ram25794 <ssingamala@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: ram25794 <ssingamala@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: ram25794 <ssingamala@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: ram25794 <ssingamala@nvidia.com>
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
{#
Copyright (c) 2024 NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES.
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this file is changed?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@oleksandrivantsiv , As we are adding new symlink to that file , I think Header check is considering it as new file addition and Header check is failing on that file. So , I had to change the copyright information.

@ram25794 ram25794 closed this Feb 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants