Add test for native pipe in commented_code_linter()

[IndrajeetPatil]

No description provided.

[AshesITR]

Why would commented_code_linter() need more tests regarding the pipe?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1799 (ea9c1f0) into main (c833f8a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head ea9c1f0 differs from pull request most recent head ff63b2e. Consider uploading reports for the commit ff63b2e to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1799   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.89%   98.89%           
=======================================
  Files         110      110           
  Lines        4692     4692           
=======================================
  Hits         4640     4640           
  Misses         52       52           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[IndrajeetPatil]

Why would commented_code_linter() need more tests regarding the pipe?

Because, currently, we are only testing the magrittr pipe, and not the native pipe.

[AshesITR]

But from a code analysis point-of-view, all the SPECIALs are equivalent, i.e. %anything% and %>% are essentially the same thing for the parser.
I'm fine with adding a |> test just-in-case, but the others seem excessive.

[IndrajeetPatil]

@AshesITR Fair enough! I've reverted changes to the ops vector that included additional infix ops.

[AshesITR]

Thanks 😊