Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements to OTel logging docs #46447

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

brunobat
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Thanks for your pull request!

Your pull request does not follow our editorial rules. Could you have a look?

  • description should not be empty, describe your intent or provide links to the issues this PR is fixing (using Fixes #NNNNN) or changelogs

This message is automatically generated by a bot.

Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2025

/cc @radcortez (opentelemetry)

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 24, 2025

🙈 The PR is closed and the preview is expired.

@brunobat brunobat force-pushed the doc-improvements-otel-logging branch from f64246d to 06ee70b Compare February 24, 2025 11:34
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Status for workflow Quarkus Documentation CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus Documentation CI on commit 06ee70b.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

Warning

There are other workflow runs running, you probably need to wait for their status before merging.

Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit 06ee70b.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

You can consult the Develocity build scans.


Flaky tests - Develocity

⚙️ JVM Integration Tests - JDK 21

📦 integration-tests/kubernetes-client-devservices

io.quarkus.kubernetes.client.devservices.it.DevServicesKubernetesITest.shouldReturnAllKeys - History

  • java.lang.RuntimeException: io.quarkus.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors [error]: Build step io.quarkus.kubernetes.client.deployment.DevServicesKubernetesProcessor\#setupKubernetesDevService threw an exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Container startup failed for image registry.k8s.io/kube-apiserver:v1.24.1 at io.quarkus.kubernetes.client.deployment.DevServicesKubernetesProcessor.setupKubernetesDevService(DevServicesKubernetesProcessor.java:123) at java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.invokeWithArguments(MethodHandle.java:733) at io.quarkus.deployment.ExtensionLoader$3.execute(ExtensionLoader.java:856) - java.lang.RuntimeException
java.lang.RuntimeException: 
java.lang.RuntimeException: io.quarkus.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.kubernetes.client.deployment.DevServicesKubernetesProcessor#setupKubernetesDevService threw an exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Container startup failed for image registry.k8s.io/kube-apiserver:v1.24.1
	at io.quarkus.kubernetes.client.deployment.DevServicesKubernetesProcessor.setupKubernetesDevService(DevServicesKubernetesProcessor.java:123)
	at java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.invokeWithArguments(MethodHandle.java:733)
	at io.quarkus.deployment.ExtensionLoader$3.execute(ExtensionLoader.java:856)
	at io.quarkus.builder.BuildContext.run(BuildContext.java:255)
	at org.jboss.threads.ContextHandler$1.runWith(ContextHandler.java:18)

@brunobat brunobat merged commit 7ffdb4b into quarkusio:main Feb 24, 2025
35 checks passed
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 3.21 - main milestone Feb 24, 2025
@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 3.21 - main, 3.19.1 Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants