Add negated ignores support

[marschattha]

Initial PR for adding negated ignores support

[qltysh]

The code coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0%

Drilldown

Path	File Coverage Δ
qlty-analysis/src/workspace_entries/matchers.rs *	1.6
qlty-check/src/patcher.rs *	-1.8
qlty-check/src/planner/plugin_workspace_entry_finder_builder.rs	0.3
qlty-cloud/src/auth/auth_flow.rs *	-0.5
qlty-config/src/library.rs *	0.5

[brynary]

@marschattha in other contexts like Classic and Git, does order matter?

[marschattha]

I don't believe order matters.

[brynary]

ChatGPT o3-mini-high says:

Yes, order matters. Git processes the .gitignore file top-to-bottom, so a negative pattern (using “!”) only re-includes files that were ignored by rules placed above it.

I think it's right.

I think we should do the same (with localized unit tests to prove it), otherwise users will probably expect it to work like that and we'll get escalatons.

[marschattha]

Oh, I think I misunderstood the original question.

Also I am not sure if similar behaviour will be feasible in our case with the current implmentation (where negated ignores will be matched as a target regardless of placement), I can take another look at this.

[brynary]

@marschattha let's talk about this one when we see each other this week!