-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-32571: Avoid raising unneeded AttributeError and silencing it C code. #5205
bpo-32571: Avoid raising unneeded AttributeError and silencing it C code. #5205
Conversation
…ode. Added _PyObject_GetAttrIdWithoutError() and used in appropriate cases.
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ PyAPI_FUNC(int) _PyObject_IsAbstract(PyObject *); | |||
/* Same as PyObject_GetAttr(), but don't raise AttributeError. */ | |||
PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) _PyObject_GetAttrWithoutError(PyObject *, PyObject *); | |||
PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) _PyObject_GetAttrId(PyObject *, struct _Py_Identifier *); | |||
PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) _PyObject_GetAttrIdWithoutError(PyObject *, struct _Py_Identifier *); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we have an int
return value so that we don't need to call PyErr_Occurred()
? IMHO, it's an API anti-pattern to require double checking what NULL
means.
PyAPI_FUNC(int) _PyObject_GetAttrIdWithoutError(
PyObject *, struct _Py_Identifier *, PyObject **);
-1
error0
not found1
found
I'd also do this for _PyObject_GetAttrWithoutError
which we committed today. /cc @methane
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sense. Go ahead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For usability, third argument should be filled with NULL when returning 1.
By it, caller can use if (val == NULL)
instead of assigning return value to local variable.
if (_PyObject_GetAttrIdWithoutError((PyObject *)deque, &PyId___dict__, &func) < 0) {
// when error happens
return NULL;
}
if (func == NULL) {
// when `__dict__` not found.
Py_RETURN_NONE;
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I agree, it's even better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then I think It would be better to rename the function to _PyObject_LookupAttrId
or _PyObject_FindAttrId
. _PyObject_GetAttrIdWithoutError
looks misleading bacause despite its name it can raise an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. "find" is far better than "without error".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like LookupAttrId. It sounds better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW, I'd also remove the leading underscore from _PyObject_GetAttrWithoutError
, making it PyObject_LookupAttr
(and we keep the underscore for _PyObject_LookupAttrId
).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, "lookup" make sense too because there are _PyType_Lookup
and _PyType_LookupId
and they doesn't set exception.
And +1 to make it public API.
Added
_PyObject_GetAttrIdWithoutError()
and used in appropriate cases.https://bugs.python.org/issue32571