-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-119317: findall instead of traverse for docutils nodes #119319
gh-119317: findall instead of traverse for docutils nodes #119319
Conversation
Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
2312026
to
3830593
Compare
Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
Thank you. |
Thanks @xsc27 for the PR, and @hugovk for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12, 3.13. |
…onGH-119319) (cherry picked from commit 0867bce) Co-authored-by: Carlos Meza <hire@carlosmeza.com>
GH-119486 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
…onGH-119319) (cherry picked from commit 0867bce) Co-authored-by: Carlos Meza <hire@carlosmeza.com>
GH-119487 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
The new method,
findall
, is a generator rather than returning a list.closes #119317