Merge pull request #1209 from jeffwidman/master

Fix spelling: explicitely --> explicitly

ISSUES.txt

@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ tags: feature
 
 - introduce pytest.mark.nocollect for not considering a function for
   test collection at all.  maybe also introduce a pytest.mark.test to
-  explicitely mark a function to become a tested one.  Lookup JUnit ways
+  explicitly mark a function to become a tested one.  Lookup JUnit ways
   of tagging tests.
 
 introduce pytest.mark.importorskip

_pytest/runner.py

@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ def skip(msg=""):
 skip.Exception = Skipped
 
 def fail(msg="", pytrace=True):
-    """ explicitely fail an currently-executing test with the given Message.
+    """ explicitly fail an currently-executing test with the given Message.
 
     :arg pytrace: if false the msg represents the full failure information
                   and no python traceback will be reported.

_pytest/vendored_packages/pluggy.py

@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ class _MultiCall:
 
     # XXX note that the __multicall__ argument is supported only
     # for pytest compatibility reasons.  It was never officially
-    # supported there and is explicitely deprecated since 2.8
+    # supported there and is explicitly deprecated since 2.8
     # so we can remove it soon, allowing to avoid the below recursion
     # in execute() and simplify/speed up the execute loop.
 

doc/en/example/markers.rst

@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ For an example on how to add and work with markers from a plugin, see
 
 .. note::
 
-    It is recommended to explicitely register markers so that:
+    It is recommended to explicitly register markers so that:
 
     * there is one place in your test suite defining your markers