Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt code example in advanced/classes.rst to new handling of forgetting to call the superclass __init__ #2429

Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/advanced/classes.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Here is an example:

YannickJadoul marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
class Dachshund(Dog):
def __init__(self, name):
Dog.__init__(self) # Without this, undefined behavior may occur if the C++ portions are referenced.
Dog.__init__(self) # Without this, a TypeError is raised.
self.name = name
def bark(self):
return "yap!"
Expand Down