Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore kubectl last applied annotation by default #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2019

Conversation

mthssdrbrg
Copy link
Contributor

Quack currently doesn't work properly with custom delimiters, at least not if one is trying to use kubectl apply as the input template contains itself (I think the main issue is that things get escaped too
many times and the template package errors out).

This PR makes sure that the path for kubectl's last applied configuration annotation is added to the list of ignored paths (unless it's already present in the list).

@mthssdrbrg mthssdrbrg requested a review from a team July 2, 2019 12:54
@mthssdrbrg mthssdrbrg force-pushed the default-ignored-paths branch from 3150986 to d8aa634 Compare July 2, 2019 12:56
@pusher-ci pusher-ci added size/L and removed size/XS labels Jul 2, 2019
@mthssdrbrg
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

@wonderhoss wonderhoss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Quack currently doesn't work properly with custom delimiters, at least
not if one is trying to use `kubectl apply` as the input template
contains itself (I *think* the main issue is that things get escaped too
many times and the `template` package errors out).
@mthssdrbrg mthssdrbrg force-pushed the default-ignored-paths branch from d8aa634 to 127a8d5 Compare July 2, 2019 14:06
@pusher-ci pusher-ci added size/XS and removed size/L labels Jul 2, 2019
@mthssdrbrg mthssdrbrg merged commit e808ee4 into master Jul 2, 2019
@pusher-ci pusher-ci deleted the default-ignored-paths branch July 2, 2019 15:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants