Ignore "fs" module in browser builds #1644
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
+1 |
|
👍 |
ForbesLindesay
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2014
Ignore "fs" module in browser builds
ashensis
pushed a commit
to ashensis/messageformat.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 10, 2016
So as to avoid webpack warnings being thrown when compiling an app with messageformat in, we need to specify a browser definition for fs. From the creator of weback to jade: pugjs/pug#1644
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While browserify uses an empty module for fs by default, webpack does not and will refuse to bundle the jade runtime. (pugjs/pug-loader#8)