-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Planning overview #1
Comments
@jywarren Looks perfect. Made a pull request with the setup phase changes. Please review |
@jywarren Should we move forward? |
Yes! Next steps may be getting the existing methods integrated into
BlurredLocation object, and getting the demos working again?
…On May 22, 2017 12:11 PM, "Mridul Nagpal" ***@***.***> wrote:
@jywarren <https://github.com/jywarren> Should we move forward?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJ03Vfuc78q3OJRUogijV5P_fJnZ0ks5r8bObgaJpZM4NYSQj>
.
|
The methods are a part of the BlurredLocation object. I didn't get the integration part. |
Sorry, maybe I missed one of the changes in the big PR. Looking in now. |
Ah, i mean integrating the code from |
@jywarren Sure on it |
:-) looks like you've already got a bite!
…On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Mridul Nagpal ***@***.***> wrote:
@jywarren <https://github.com/jywarren> Please have a look at #6
<#6> and add
the first-timers-only label to it I couldn't find a way to do it
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJwoSLT8fbcUpx9H-ZUF9iBrBUsxtks5r9G2LgaJpZM4NYSQj>
.
|
@jywarren First five of the setup phase are done I guess |
Super. Thanks for your hard work on this! I was trying to get the demo working in publiclab's github pages, but it was being weird. Have you been able to get the demo working in gh-pages on your own repository? |
Hi, @mridulnagpal -- i've added a set of sub-issues to help you over the next week. Can you please take a look: https://github.com/publiclab/leaflet-blurred-location/milestones I hope this is helpful! Now that your basic library is in place, things can start to happen faster! |
Coming along here. Once we have the Graticule work done, we can start really checking these off. I added some detail to |
@jywarren Which link do I send as my GSoC evaluation? |
There's a discussion by email going on about this. I think a research note
posting which links to this would be ideal.
…On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Mridul Nagpal ***@***.***> wrote:
@jywarren <https://github.com/jywarren> Which link do I send as my GSoC
evaluation?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJy6cXnCPbEsltEcyvFXhtik9RUpbks5safMPgaJpZM4NYSQj>
.
|
Sure, on it! What all things you want to be done before the deadline? |
Do you think it's realistic to complete a basic version of the Display
library by then?
…On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Mridul Nagpal ***@***.***> wrote:
Sure, on it! What all things you want to be done before the deadline?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJ5AnwJz8pmndzPc72uCOEqrWltsEks5safUCgaJpZM4NYSQj>
.
|
I will try my best, we can atleast have some basic functionalities. |
OK, i went ahead and released: https://www.npmjs.com/package/leaflet-blurred-location |
Cheeersss !!!!!
On 02-Sep-2017 10:51 PM, "Jeffrey Warren" <notifications@github.com> wrote:
OK, i went ahead and released: https://www.npmjs.com/package/
leaflet-blurred-location v1.1.0 -- now we have to be careful following
semver.org!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVULlJCEe7lukUrjpqkDK5rcV55ZqJvOks5seY6VgaJpZM4NYSQj>
.
|
GitHub release is done -- but the https://github.com/publiclab/leaflet-blurred-location/releases/tag/v1.1.0 is good |
Sure :-)
…On 02-Sep-2017 10:57 PM, "Jeffrey Warren" ***@***.***> wrote:
GitHub release is done -- but the npm publish isn't going very fast.
Please give me a little more time to do this from a good internet
connection...
https://github.com/publiclab/leaflet-blurred-location/releases/tag/v1.1.0
is good
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVULlK-1ZWVWbwiIKMbcyT5mX_a5z6QFks5seZAGgaJpZM4NYSQj>
.
|
whoa, apparently it's 18mb... not sure why but that's a lot. Taking a while. |
ok! done! |
Cool, if you want to give an update on the display library i'd love to catch up! |
It's in an initial phase with basic functioning. So let's work on it then!! |
I'm closing this as I've broken out the last item! Congratulations! Now we need to do some UI work on plots2. |
OK, just starting out here, feel free to edit/adapt this! Each of these could become a milestone with issues, perhaps?
Basically, in this new repository, the library should be exposed via a "constructor", like:
Setup phase
publiclab
fork, so we can open pull requests against this more easily?var location = new BlurredLocation(options);
options
can be, or are required, if any, point at the example HTML and setup code, show constructor usageInterface phase
examples/simple.html
which starts without the grid and has no checkbox to turn on blurring -- just a "normal" location input.location.getLat()
andlocation.getFullLat()
location.goTo(lat, lon, [zoom])
location.geocode(string)
alert(lat + ',' + lon)
Interface phase 2
Write tests
location.goTo()
location.geocode()
with test string like “Buenos Aires”location.getLat()
andgetLon()
location.getFullLat()
is longer thanlocation.getLat()
etclocation.getPrecision()
location.setPrecision()
(this might be run as you zoom the Leaflet map in and out, and/or you could make the map zoom by running this)Now once we have clearly tested behaviors we can rely upon, we can move on to integration, using those very standardized methods!
Integration phase
location:blurred
tagUserTags
to be more likeTags
, so we can send itlat:___
&lon:____
tags, just like a node (captured in Remove key:value features of UserTag plots2#1417)/api/geo/41.0/-61.5
(to get a 1x1 degree bounding box?)Optional
Delay for now
Some features, in discussion with @steviepubliclab and @ebarry, are not as urgent, and we’d like to de-emphasize them in favor of getting the above systems running faster.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: