Restructure API

[Divy123]

Fixes #251

Make sure these boxes are checked before your pull request (PR) is ready to be reviewed and merged. Thanks!

• tests pass -- look for a green checkbox ✔️ a few minutes after opening your PR -- or run tests locally with npm test
• code is in uniquely-named feature branch and has no merge conflicts
• PR is descriptively titled
• ask @publiclab/is-reviewers for help, in a comment below

We're happy to help you get this ready -- don't be afraid to ask for help, and don't be discouraged if your tests fail at first!

If tests do fail, click on the red X to learn why by reading the logs.

Please be sure you've reviewed our contribution guidelines at https://publiclab.org/contributing-to-public-lab-software

Thanks!

[Divy123]

Will soon complete the work and write the tests.

[Divy123]

@jywarren I have refactored the whole code.
This PR is of high priority.
Please review and merge this on a priority basis.
Sorry for the delay as I faced some laptop breakdown in between .

[Divy123]

@jywarren please review.

[jywarren]

Divy123 can you push it to your own gh-pages branch so we can try it out? Thanks this is epic and impressive! Asking a review from @publiclab/is-reviewers!!

[harshkhandeparkar]

Awesome! This will be backwards incompatible so it can be released with the next major version v3.0.0.

[Divy123]

I am sorry for leaving some commented code behind. Deleting it.
Thanks @harshkhandeparkar .
@harshkhandeparkar can you please help me out with hosting my version on gh pages.
Thanks.

[harshkhandeparkar]

Sure, all you have to do is checkout gh-pages, merge this branch with it, npm run setup, force commit node_modules and wait for some time and you will receive an email saying that the build was complete, it might have a CNAME error which is nothing to worry about. The site will be available on https://divy123.github.io/image-sequencer/

[harshkhandeparkar]

Oh yes, you also have to activate github pages for the repo in the repo settings. Thanks.

[Divy123]

@jywarren it's hosted at https://divy123.github.io/image-sequencer/
Please review.

[jywarren]

This is really impressive. The demo works properly for me, and the tests show very clearly that it runs fine and that the syntax is much simpler. I approve this but would love one more review from someone!

[jywarren]

@harshkhandeparkar did this look good to you too?

[harshkhandeparkar]

A few changes suggested although I think I reviewed dist files so please make the required changes in the proper files. Sorry.

[Divy123]

@harshkhandeparkar Made the said changes.

@jywarren I think its ready to be merged now.

[harshkhandeparkar]

✔️ ready! You can add the label if you want

[Divy123]

@jywarren please merge this.

[jywarren]

Wow, very exciting. Do we need to update the readme first? Shall we add changes there too? I agree this is ready to merge, though. Let's do the readme changes at the same time but it could be a separate PR if easier, or the same. What do you think?

[Divy123]

Surely I forgot to !!
Doing it right away..

[Divy123]

@jywarren Done with README!!
Thanks for reminding. 😄

[Divy123]

@jywarren opinions please!!

[jywarren]

Hi @Divy123 just noting in my last 2 comments that removeSteps and insertSteps are now missing from the README -- shall we just adapt them for the single-image model, and not just delete those sections? Then we should be good to merge here! Thank you!

[Divy123]

@jywarren please look into the screenshot:

I think there is some confusion.
I have not deleted the removeSteps() and insertSteps() as a whole but I have deleted these two in the section where these two functionalities were explained for multiple images in a single sequencer object case.
You may look here as both the sections are still present.
https://github.com/Divy123/image-sequencer/blob/restructure-api/README.md

[Divy123]

@jywarren please look into.

[jywarren]

Ah ok perfect. Just checking. Merging this now!!!!

[jywarren]

Amazing work! Bumping to 3.0.0, breaking changes. Heads up @publiclab/is-reviewers !!! 🙌🏽😅🎉🎉🎉