Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PeerDAS Feature Flag #13865

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2024
Merged

Add PeerDAS Feature Flag #13865

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

nisdas
Copy link
Member

@nisdas nisdas commented Apr 11, 2024

What type of PR is this?

Feature

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

This PR implements a feature flag so that all peer das related changes to core code can be put behind a flag. Doing this allows us to be able to experiment on this in an easier fashion along with making this much simpler to modify for any future forks.

Which issues(s) does this PR fix?

N.A

Other notes for review

@nisdas nisdas requested a review from a team as a code owner April 11, 2024 03:58
@nisdas nisdas requested review from nalepae, saolyn and james-prysm and removed request for a team April 11, 2024 03:58
@@ -254,6 +256,12 @@ func ConfigureBeaconChain(ctx *cli.Context) error {
logEnabled(BlobSaveFsync)
cfg.BlobSaveFsync = true
}
// For the p.o.c we enable it by default.
cfg.EnablePeerDAS = true
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might want to be careful with this one. Don't merge everything to develop later thinking it's feature-flag gated but forget this line still exists.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yeah definitely, in any case even if we merge to develop a node with this enabled will immediately stall since all the topics are non-existent in mainnet or any of the testnets

@nisdas nisdas merged commit c57203d into peerDAS Apr 11, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@nisdas nisdas deleted the addpeerDASFeature branch April 11, 2024 06:26
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
nisdas added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
nisdas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
nisdas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
nisdas added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2024
nisdas added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2024
nisdas added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
nalepae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants