-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 928
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
paper: Update to citations #2620
base: paper_2024
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -139,14 +140,12 @@ @article{ghanem2022balancing | |||
doi = {10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101195} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@article{taberna2023uncertainty, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to keep this citation in
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wrote a response to this, but I wanted to ensure I wasn't missing something -- why keep this citation? Would you like to suggest removing another one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its a pnas paper, so a high profile journal.
Its also from close colleagues that are highly respected in ecological economics and some related fields.
@@ -105,15 +105,16 @@ @article{nageli2020towards | |||
doi = {10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109763} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@article{anatolitis2017putting, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agent-based energy markets are quite hot right now, so it might also be useful to keep this one.
@jackiekazil I think you can just add the papers you want without removing any.
We have too many that are redundant and lack a variety of domains. If we are going to add more, I would like to add more from other domains, but I was trying not to extend the list. From the original list, these articles seem duplicative in their topic. Environment related:
Energy markets:
@EwoutH, energy markets are 100% - in Europe because of policy in EU policies relating to this. It is less hot around the world. I am open to some other make-up to show a diversity of topics. But if we are extending the list, I would like to discuss not having a duplicate. I want to avoid the story of "Mesa is used for environmental modeling and energy markets and some other things" and provide a story that is "Mesa is used for energy market modeling, environmental modeling, autonomous vehicle routing, simulation of computational resources, health and medicine (internal and external to the human body), biological, ecological, evolutionary, wildlife management, operations management (in healthcare and technology), etc etc." I am okay with a different setup, like removing one of the others. However, we need to keep the list brief and show more diversity within the list because there are so many potential others that we could be adding that show a greater diversity of domain applications. |
This is a list I have pulled from doing various presentations. It is not a perfect list by no means. But it might help with discussion when we talk about what to include and not include. Healthcare relatedInternal
External
Healthcare Ops
EnergyPositive Energy District (PEDs)
Markets
Energy Adoption
TechnicalSecurity
Optimization of Operations
Biological, Ecological, EvolutionaryGeneral
Wildlife Management
OtherTravel:
Web3:
Other areas:
|
Make updates to do two citations. It is a hard exercise to limit what is selected because of the breadth and depth that Mesa has applied.
Removed:
The list of citations felt like it was repetitive when it came to themes of climate change, energy, and markets, so I removed the lower-ranking ones to try to create a more unique list.
Added:
Both of the ones I added also have code online associated with them.
From my last assessment of Mesa citations, significant areas include Health/Medical, Energy policy everything (because of EU regulatory policy that impacted markets), Climate change/management and disasters, technical-social applications (security, w3 applications), biological, ecological, and evolutionary.
^^ Noting this, does the current list represent Mesa's various applications? I would like to know if it still skews too heavily on the infrastructure and/or disaster/instability sides. We could add more, but then it feels too long. Thoughts?
Part of #2559.