Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/add mandatory asterisk #2871

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

tstoppe89
Copy link
Contributor

@tstoppe89 tstoppe89 commented Jan 6, 2025

Description

added mandatory asterisk configuration option for labels of form questions

@czosel czosel requested a review from anehx January 6, 2025 13:22
@czosel
Copy link
Contributor

czosel commented Jan 6, 2025

@anehx do you want to take a look at this one as well?

@anehx
Copy link
Contributor

anehx commented Jan 6, 2025

Also what I forgot in my review: We test if it works when that option is passed directly to the component which is very unlikely to happen but not whether the actual configuration of that feature using USE_MANDATORY_ASTERISK works.

Copy link
Contributor

@anehx anehx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some really minor changes are still needed but in general this looks great!

packages/form/addon/components/cf-field/label.hbs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/form/addon/components/cf-field/label.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@anehx anehx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect! 💯

This can be merged (and squashed) as soon as the linter is happy.

@czosel czosel merged commit d23f5ad into projectcaluma:main Jan 7, 2025
50 checks passed
@tstoppe89 tstoppe89 deleted the feature/add-mandatory-asterisk branch January 8, 2025 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants