-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed/Added CASE Identity Checks. #15829
Merged
woody-apple
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
emargolis:emargolis/feature/case-identity-check
Mar 5, 2022
Merged
Fixed/Added CASE Identity Checks. #15829
woody-apple
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
emargolis:emargolis/feature/case-identity-check
Mar 5, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PR #15829: Size comparison from 5a8ffc1 to 67fe3ef Increases (21 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
Full report (22 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
|
bzbarsky-apple
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2022
andy31415
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2022
Added checks: -- Verify that peer NOC FabricId matches the expected Fabric ID. -- On Processing of Sigma2: Verify that peer NodeId matches one used to generate Destination Identifier in Sigma1. -- On Processing of Sigma3: Assign peer NodeId from peer NOC. -- If root certificate includes Fabric ID verify it matches ICAC and NOC Fabric IDs.
67fe3ef
to
36e101f
Compare
tcarmelveilleux
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2022
PR #15829: Size comparison from 9dcdf37 to 36e101f Increases (30 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
Full report (31 builds for cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
|
woody-apple
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2022
Was looking at resolution for my comments and realized this logic just does not match the spec. Filed #15892 @emargolis |
This was referenced Mar 7, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
CASE identity checks are not done (#8859)
Following Spec clarifications:
Add missing identity checks in CASE #3682
Change overview
Added checks:
-- Verify that peer NOC FabricId matches the expected Fabric ID.
-- On Processing of Sigma2: Verify that peer NodeId matches one used to generate
Destination Identifier in Sigma1.
-- On Processing of Sigma3: Assign peer NodeId from peer NOC.
-- If root certificate includes Fabric ID verify it matches ICAC and NOC Fabric IDs.
Testing
Existing tests