You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Requires switching the function API for the conformance checks since now we require a VALUE check rather than an existence check. First step is to match current behaviour using optional, then move over to proper checks.
Platform
python
Platform Version(s)
No response
Type
Manually tested with SDK
(Optional) If manually tested please explain why this is only manually tested
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CHIP-Specifications/connectedhomeip-spec#7808
represents the first arithmetic conformance operation. Adding
a new conformance class to match this. Currently this just returns
optional to match the current behaviour, but this will be changed
in an upcoming PR (see
project-chip#33422)
However, thet change requires that we assess the conformance based
on the attribute values, which we do pass in right now. This
therefore requires a bit of an API change on the conformance classes
and I've opted to address this in a separate PR to keep the changes
compact.
* Conformance: add start of arithmetic conformance
CHIP-Specifications/connectedhomeip-spec#7808
represents the first arithmetic conformance operation. Adding
a new conformance class to match this. Currently this just returns
optional to match the current behaviour, but this will be changed
in an upcoming PR (see
#33422)
However, thet change requires that we assess the conformance based
on the attribute values, which we do pass in right now. This
therefore requires a bit of an API change on the conformance classes
and I've opted to address this in a separate PR to keep the changes
compact.
* linter
Reproduction steps / Feature
We have one now. The time has come.
Requires switching the function API for the conformance checks since now we require a VALUE check rather than an existence check. First step is to match current behaviour using optional, then move over to proper checks.
Platform
python
Platform Version(s)
No response
Type
Manually tested with SDK
(Optional) If manually tested please explain why this is only manually tested
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: