Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing Jurisdiction Requirements #937

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2022
Merged

Removing Jurisdiction Requirements #937

merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

freddy-m
Copy link
Member

@freddy-m freddy-m commented Apr 7, 2022

@freddy-m freddy-m requested a review from dngray April 7, 2022 15:17
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 7, 2022

Deploy Preview for privacyguides ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7f2b3fc
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/privacyguides/deploys/624f1716fd7f2000085e95b1
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-937--privacyguides.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

dngray pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2022
@dngray dngray force-pushed the freddy-m-patch-1 branch from f8728fe to 6e6fe4e Compare April 7, 2022 15:49
@dngray
Copy link
Member

dngray commented Apr 7, 2022

We probably want to write a blog post about this before we merge and also update the VPN page's criteria, it was discussed quite thoroughly privacytools/privacytools.io#1437

@dngray dngray added the c:providers service providers and similar centralized/federated services label Apr 7, 2022
dngray pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2022
@dngray dngray force-pushed the freddy-m-patch-1 branch from 6e6fe4e to 7f2b3fc Compare April 7, 2022 16:53
@dngray dngray mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2022
docs/email.md Outdated
@@ -295,19 +295,6 @@ Tutanota is working on a [desktop client](https://tutanota.com/blog/posts/deskto

**Please note we are not affiliated with any of the providers we recommend.** This allows us to provide completely objective recommendations. We have developed a clear set of requirements for any Email provider wishing to be recommended, including implementing industry best practices, modern technology and more. We suggest you familiarize yourself with this list before choosing an Email provider, and conduct your own research to ensure the Email provider you choose is the right choice for you.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Considering adding Why removed the requirements and reason not to Consider about Eyes Countries.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I intend to write a blog post about it actually.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, Then Hyperlink your post after you have completed writing.

@dngray dngray mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jonaharagon jonaharagon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs to be removed on VPN.md as well.

@dngray
Copy link
Member

dngray commented Apr 14, 2022

Needs to be removed on VPN.md as well.

Yep, we're looking at #960 (comment) first as i want to get some of the threat modeling stuff done first, that way when we look at vpn/email we can refer to threat modeling page instead.

@jonaharagon jonaharagon marked this pull request as draft April 21, 2022 22:54
@jonaharagon jonaharagon force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 456d09f to 0f4a35d Compare April 27, 2022 02:52
@dngray dngray force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 5445291 to 4cec0a0 Compare May 15, 2022 13:29
Co-Authored-By: Daniel Gray <dng@disroot.org>
@dngray dngray force-pushed the freddy-m-patch-1 branch from 7f2b3fc to e0c11ad Compare May 24, 2022 07:57
@dngray dngray temporarily deployed to preview May 24, 2022 07:57 Inactive
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 24, 2022

🎊 PR Preview e0c11ad has been successfully built and deployed to https://privacyguides-privacyguides-org-preview-pr-937.surge.sh

🕐 Build time: 99.746s

🤖 By surge-preview

@dngray
Copy link
Member

dngray commented May 24, 2022

Needs to be removed on VPN.md as well.

Okay, done, now we've got the threat modeling page, this makes a bit more sense.

@dngray dngray marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2022 07:58
@dngray dngray dismissed jonaharagon’s stale review May 24, 2022 07:58

Removed from VPN page

@dngray dngray merged commit e0c11ad into main May 24, 2022
@dngray dngray deleted the freddy-m-patch-1 branch May 24, 2022 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c:providers service providers and similar centralized/federated services
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🌐 Website Issue | Redefine requirement on services Five Eyes under a Juristiction section
4 participants