-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 410
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TestUtils: read all blocks and sort them by handle before comparison. #5745
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/run-all-tests |
d3521f1
to
495614c
Compare
/run-all-tests |
495614c
to
b3f47d7
Compare
/run-all-tests |
b3f47d7
to
f864c2d
Compare
/run-all-tests |
f864c2d
to
06f8189
Compare
06f8189
to
9819cd3
Compare
/run-all-tests |
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
/run-unit-test |
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
/run-unit-test |
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
/run-all-tests |
/cc @ywqzzy |
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Co-authored-by: yanweiqi <592838129@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: yanweiqi <592838129@qq.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
/merge |
@JinheLin: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: db82f7e
|
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
@JinheLin: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #5689
Problem Summary:
Blocks can be unordered when read-thread-pool enabled if there are more than one segments.
To simplify testing, read all blocks and sort them by handle column before comparison.
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note