Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

br: make table existence check unified on different br client #58211

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

RidRisR
Copy link
Contributor

@RidRisR RidRisR commented Dec 12, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #58168

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Remove the client check of tableExistenceCheck, now it works on both sql and cli client.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.
截屏2024-12-12 18 36 48_副本

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked labels Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Hi @RidRisR. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.7679%. Comparing base (1d53c85) to head (065fdee).
Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #58211        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.2271%   74.7679%   +1.5408%     
================================================
  Files          1676       1691        +15     
  Lines        462084     463090      +1006     
================================================
+ Hits         338371     346243      +7872     
+ Misses       102947      95306      -7641     
- Partials      20766      21541       +775     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 46.3143% <ø> (?)
unit 72.3112% <ø> (-0.0543%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 61.5931% <ø> (+15.6293%) ⬆️

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. labels Dec 12, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 13, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 13, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BornChanger, YuJuncen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Dec 13, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 13, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-12-12 10:24:48.717678653 +0000 UTC m=+520478.806481197: ☑️ agreed by YuJuncen.
  • 2024-12-13 02:42:33.433321346 +0000 UTC m=+579143.522123887: ☑️ agreed by BornChanger.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 13, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit c1083de into pingcap:master Dec 13, 2024
27 checks passed
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #58244.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #58245.

@RidRisR RidRisR deleted the unifyclient branch December 13, 2024 06:34
@BornChanger BornChanger added needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. labels Dec 14, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #58262.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #58263.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #58264.

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 19, 2024

@RidRisR: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-br-integration-test 26d27e2 link true /test pull-br-integration-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. label Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

br: clp restore db/tbl behavior is different from br sql
5 participants