Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: add protection to avoid setting tot_col_size to negative numbers (#55327) #57142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

@qw4990 qw4990 commented Nov 5, 2024

This is an automated cherry-pick of #55327

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #55126

Problem Summary: planner: add protection to avoid setting tot_col_size to negative numbers

What changed and how does it work?

See more details and analysis in the issue.
When updating tot_col_size, use GREATEST to protect it from becoming a negative number.

Hard to use UT to test it, so I tested it manually locally:

First I hacked the code below to simulate all positive updates on tot_col_size are lost:
image

Then execute those SQLs:

mysql> create table t (a varchar(100), key(a));
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)

mysql> analyze table t;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 2 warnings (0.03 sec)

mysql> insert into t values (space(100));
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)

mysql> update t set a="";
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
Rows matched: 1  Changed: 1  Warnings: 0

Then we can see the tot_col_size becomes a negative number:

mysql> show stats_histograms;
+---------+------------+----------------+-------------+----------+---------------------+----------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------+
| Db_name | Table_name | Partition_name | Column_name | Is_index | Update_time         | Distinct_count | Null_count | Avg_col_size | Correlation | Load_status | Total_mem_usage | Hist_mem_usage | Topn_mem_usage | Cms_mem_usage |
+---------+------------+----------------+-------------+----------+---------------------+----------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------+
| test    | t          |                | a           |        0 | 2024-08-09 14:39:42 |              0 |          0 |         -101 |           0 | allLoaded   |               0 |              0 |              0 |             0 |
+---------+------------+----------------+-------------+----------+---------------------+----------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------+

After this PR, this case won't happen, at least we can ensure it's equal or larger than 0:

mysql> show stats_histograms;
+---------+------------+----------------+-------------+----------+---------------------+----------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------+
| Db_name | Table_name | Partition_name | Column_name | Is_index | Update_time         | Distinct_count | Null_count | Avg_col_size | Correlation | Load_status | Total_mem_usage | Hist_mem_usage | Topn_mem_usage | Cms_mem_usage |
+---------+------------+----------------+-------------+----------+---------------------+----------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------+
| test    | t          |                | a           |        0 | 2024-08-09 14:47:16 |              0 |          0 |            0 |           0 | allLoaded   |               0 |              0 |              0 |             0 |
+---------+------------+----------------+-------------+----------+---------------------+----------------+------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------+

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Nov 5, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Hi @qw4990. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved labels Nov 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release-7.1@a806e92). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-7.1     #57142   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   73.4625%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1212           
  Lines                  ?     380850           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     279782           
  Misses                 ?      83212           
  Partials               ?      17856           

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the lgtm label Nov 5, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, hawkingrei

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [AilinKid,hawkingrei]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Nov 5, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 5, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-11-05 12:46:19.645368232 +0000 UTC m=+958692.484523763: ☑️ agreed by hawkingrei.
  • 2024-11-05 13:17:09.057610866 +0000 UTC m=+960541.896766411: ☑️ agreed by AilinKid.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 3508c6b into pingcap:release-7.1 Nov 5, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants