-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: add protection to avoid setting tot_col_size
to negative numbers (#55327)
#55523
planner: add protection to avoid setting tot_col_size
to negative numbers (#55327)
#55523
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-8.1 #55523 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 71.2759%
================================================
Files ? 1466
Lines ? 423367
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 301759
Misses ? 101138
Partials ? 20470
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fixdb, hawkingrei The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
This is an automated cherry-pick of #55327
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #55126
Problem Summary: planner: add protection to avoid setting
tot_col_size
to negative numbersWhat changed and how does it work?
See more details and analysis in the issue.
When updating
tot_col_size
, useGREATEST
to protect it from becoming a negative number.Hard to use UT to test it, so I tested it manually locally:
First I hacked the code below to simulate all positive updates on

tot_col_size
are lost:Then execute those SQLs:
Then we can see the
tot_col_size
becomes a negative number:After this PR, this case won't happen, at least we can ensure it's equal or larger than
0
:Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.