Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

br: PiTR restore batch apply kv-files #38772

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Nov 22, 2022

Conversation

joccau
Copy link
Member

@joccau joccau commented Oct 31, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #38211

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

  • PITR support applying kv-files into tikv with batch method.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Support restoring a batch of kv-files when pitr to down-cluster.

Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 31, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Leavrth
  • YuJuncen

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 31, 2022
@joccau joccau added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. component/br This issue is related to BR of TiDB. labels Oct 31, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Oct 31, 2022
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
@joccau joccau force-pushed the enhance-restore-kvfiles branch from 1b58fba to bc9ee84 Compare November 7, 2022 15:49
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
@joccau joccau force-pushed the enhance-restore-kvfiles branch 2 times, most recently from 4254278 to a7eb998 Compare November 13, 2022 14:12
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 13, 2022
@joccau joccau force-pushed the enhance-restore-kvfiles branch from a7eb998 to bffdf5e Compare November 14, 2022 01:46
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
@joccau joccau force-pushed the enhance-restore-kvfiles branch from bffdf5e to 9de3343 Compare November 14, 2022 07:47
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
@joccau joccau changed the title br: PiTR restore batch apply kv-files(WIP) br: PiTR restore batch apply kv-files Nov 14, 2022
@joccau joccau force-pushed the enhance-restore-kvfiles branch from dd41789 to eda5a08 Compare November 14, 2022 11:00
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 22, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 22, 2022
joccau and others added 4 commits November 22, 2022 11:22
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: joccau <zak.zhao@pingcap.com>
@joccau
Copy link
Member Author

joccau commented Nov 22, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 6c84265

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 22, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 22, 2022
@joccau
Copy link
Member Author

joccau commented Nov 22, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 2fa5802

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 22, 2022
@joccau
Copy link
Member Author

joccau commented Nov 22, 2022

/run-check_dev_2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 2103466 into pingcap:master Nov 22, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Nov 22, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟥 failed 1, success 10, total 11 10 min New failing
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🔴 failed 1, success 38, total 39 18 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🔴 failed 1, success 0, total 1 11 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 ✅ all 26 tests passed 6 min 30 sec Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 17 tests passed 27 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 6 min 41 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 6 min 16 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 5 min 50 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 41 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

@joccau joccau deleted the enhance-restore-kvfiles branch January 10, 2023 02:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/br This issue is related to BR of TiDB. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

br restore log data too slow, and the speed is 8.14 GB/H per tikv
5 participants