-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: outer merge join cannot keep the prop of its inner child (#33359) #33375
planner: outer merge join cannot keep the prop of its inner child (#33359) #33375
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/run-all-tests |
@winoros you're already a collaborator in bot's repo. |
Please address conflict @winoros |
planner/core/integration_test.go
Outdated
@@ -5226,3 +5226,320 @@ func (s *testIntegrationSuite) TestIssue31202(c *C) { | |||
"└─TableFullScan 10000.00 cop[tikv] table:t31202 keep order:false, stats:pseudo")) | |||
tk.MustExec("drop table if exists t31202") | |||
} | |||
<<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need resolve conflicts
PTAL @XuHuaiyu |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 81a3a87
|
Code Coverage Details: https://codecov.io/github/pingcap/tidb/commit/81a3a873871e2b5a6307d8e5fd3b0a2d58a71016 |
/rebuild |
cherry-pick #33359 to release-5.4
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:
# In tidb repo: git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/33375
After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #33042
Problem Summary:
If the merge join is outer join. We cannot make sure that its output can keep the input order of the inner side.
What is changed and how it works?
Reject the mentioned case.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note