Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: do not adopt fast plan for binary literal strings (#31283) #31355

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 6, 2022

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Jan 5, 2022

cherry-pick #31283 to release-5.4
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/31355

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/31355:release-5.4-9cc1b169f908

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #31281

Problem Summary:

mysql> create table t (a varchar(255) charset gbk primary key /*T![clustered_index] clustered */, b int);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> insert into t values ('你好', 1);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> explain select * from t where a = 0xC4E3BAC3;
+-------------+---------+------+---------------+---------------+
| id          | estRows | task | access object | operator info |
+-------------+---------+------+---------------+---------------+
| TableDual_2 | 0.00    | root |               | rows:0        |
+-------------+---------+------+---------------+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from t where a = 0xC4E3BAC3;
Empty set (0.00 sec)

This is because the incorrect handling for the point-get value:

dVal, err := d.ConvertTo(stmtCtx, &col.FieldType)
if err != nil {
if terror.ErrorEqual(types.ErrOverflow, err) {
return append(nvPairs, nameValuePair{colName: colName.Name.Name.L, value: d, param: param}), true
}
// Some scenarios cast to int with error, but we may use this value in point get.
if !terror.ErrorEqual(types.ErrTruncatedWrongVal, err) {
return nil, false
}
}
// The converted result must be same as original datum.
cmp, err := dVal.Compare(stmtCtx, &d, collate.GetCollator(col.Collate))
if err != nil {
return nil, false
} else if cmp != 0 {
return append(nvPairs, nameValuePair{colName: colName.Name.Name.L, value: dVal, param: param}), true
}

After #31031, ConvertTo() takes the responsibility of converting the binary literal from a given charset to utf-8 strings. In this code snippet, line 1220 assumes that all the values processed by ConvertTo() should be identical to themself. Otherwise, this query gets nothing.

This assumption may be correct for truncating case like querying "aaaa" against char(2) column, but it is not true for binary literal strings.

What is changed and how it works?

In this PR, I remove the above assumption and let it fallback to normal plan building. While it may affect performance, they are corner cases anyway.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jan 5, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • crazycs520
  • zimulala

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jan 5, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jan 5, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.4-cherry-pick labels Jan 5, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tangenta you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jan 5, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@zimulala zimulala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jan 6, 2022
@tangenta tangenta added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Jan 6, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. labels Jan 6, 2022
@tangenta
Copy link
Contributor

tangenta commented Jan 6, 2022

@pingcap/qa-release-merge PTAL

@VelocityLight VelocityLight added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Jan 6, 2022
@VelocityLight
Copy link

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: cc1d538

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jan 6, 2022
@VelocityLight
Copy link

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit be35acf into pingcap:release-5.4 Jan 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/5.4-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants