[Tiered Caching] Moving query recomputation logic outside of write lo…

…ck (opensearch-project#14187) * Moving query recompute out of write lock Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * [Tiered Caching] Moving query recomputation logic outside of write lock Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * Adding java doc for the completable map Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * Changes to call future handler only once per key Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * Fixing spotless check Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * Added changelog Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * Addressing comments Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * Fixing gradle fail Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * Addressing comments to refactor unit test Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> * minor UT refactor Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <sagar.upadhyaya.121@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sagar <99425694+sgup432@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sagar Upadhyaya <upasagar@amazon.com>
peteralfonsi · Sep 3, 2024 · 29ec9d6 · 29ec9d6
1 parent 8347779
commit 29ec9d6
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 405 additions and 19 deletions.
diff --git a/...les/cache-common/src/main/java/org/opensearch/cache/common/tier/TieredSpilloverCache.java b/...les/cache-common/src/main/java/org/opensearch/cache/common/tier/TieredSpilloverCache.java
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
 
 package org.opensearch.cache.common.tier;
 
+import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
+import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
 import org.opensearch.cache.common.policy.TookTimePolicy;
 import org.opensearch.common.annotation.ExperimentalApi;
 import org.opensearch.common.cache.CacheType;
@@ -35,9 +37,13 @@
 import java.util.Map;
 import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
 import java.util.Objects;
+import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
 import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
 import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReadWriteLock;
 import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock;
+import java.util.function.BiFunction;
 import java.util.function.Function;
 import java.util.function.Predicate;
 import java.util.function.ToLongBiFunction;
@@ -61,6 +67,7 @@ public class TieredSpilloverCache<K, V> implements ICache<K, V> {
 
     // Used to avoid caching stale entries in lower tiers.
     private static final List<RemovalReason> SPILLOVER_REMOVAL_REASONS = List.of(RemovalReason.EVICTED, RemovalReason.CAPACITY);
+    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(TieredSpilloverCache.class);
 
     private final ICache<K, V> diskCache;
     private final ICache<K, V> onHeapCache;
@@ -86,6 +93,12 @@ public class TieredSpilloverCache<K, V> implements ICache<K, V> {
     private final Map<ICache<K, V>, TierInfo> caches;
     private final List<Predicate<V>> policies;
 
+    /**
+     * This map is used to handle concurrent requests for same key in computeIfAbsent() to ensure we load the value
+     * only once.
+     */
+    Map<ICacheKey<K>, CompletableFuture<Tuple<ICacheKey<K>, V>>> completableFutureMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
+
     TieredSpilloverCache(Builder<K, V> builder) {
         Objects.requireNonNull(builder.onHeapCacheFactory, "onHeap cache builder can't be null");
         Objects.requireNonNull(builder.diskCacheFactory, "disk cache builder can't be null");
@@ -190,10 +203,7 @@ public V computeIfAbsent(ICacheKey<K> key, LoadAwareCacheLoader<ICacheKey<K>, V>
             // Add the value to the onHeap cache. We are calling computeIfAbsent which does another get inside.
             // This is needed as there can be many requests for the same key at the same time and we only want to load
             // the value once.
-            V value = null;
-            try (ReleasableLock ignore = writeLock.acquire()) {
-                value = onHeapCache.computeIfAbsent(key, loader);
-            }
+            V value = compute(key, loader);
             // Handle stats
             if (loader.isLoaded()) {
                 // The value was just computed and added to the cache by this thread. Register a miss for the heap cache, and the disk cache
@@ -222,6 +232,57 @@ public V computeIfAbsent(ICacheKey<K> key, LoadAwareCacheLoader<ICacheKey<K>, V>
         return cacheValueTuple.v1();
     }
 
+    private V compute(ICacheKey<K> key, LoadAwareCacheLoader<ICacheKey<K>, V> loader) throws Exception {
+        // Only one of the threads will succeed putting a future into map for the same key.
+        // Rest will fetch existing future and wait on that to complete.
+        CompletableFuture<Tuple<ICacheKey<K>, V>> future = completableFutureMap.putIfAbsent(key, new CompletableFuture<>());
+        // Handler to handle results post processing. Takes a tuple<key, value> or exception as an input and returns
+        // the value. Also before returning value, puts the value in cache.
+        BiFunction<Tuple<ICacheKey<K>, V>, Throwable, Void> handler = (pair, ex) -> {
+            if (pair != null) {
+                try (ReleasableLock ignore = writeLock.acquire()) {
+                    onHeapCache.put(pair.v1(), pair.v2());
+                } catch (Exception e) {
+                    // TODO: Catch specific exceptions to know whether this resulted from cache or underlying removal
+                    // listeners/stats. Needs better exception handling at underlying layers.For now swallowing
+                    // exception.
+                    logger.warn("Exception occurred while putting item onto heap cache", e);
+                }
+            } else {
+                if (ex != null) {
+                    logger.warn("Exception occurred while trying to compute the value", ex);
+                }
+            }
+            completableFutureMap.remove(key); // Remove key from map as not needed anymore.
+            return null;
+        };
+        V value = null;
+        if (future == null) {
+            future = completableFutureMap.get(key);
+            future.handle(handler);
+            try {
+                value = loader.load(key);
+            } catch (Exception ex) {
+                future.completeExceptionally(ex);
+                throw new ExecutionException(ex);
+            }
+            if (value == null) {
+                NullPointerException npe = new NullPointerException("Loader returned a null value");
+                future.completeExceptionally(npe);
+                throw new ExecutionException(npe);
+            } else {
+                future.complete(new Tuple<>(key, value));
+            }
+        } else {
+            try {
+                value = future.get().v2();
+            } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
+                throw new IllegalStateException(ex);
+            }
+        }
+        return value;
+    }
+
     @Override
     public void invalidate(ICacheKey<K> key) {
         // We are trying to invalidate the key from all caches though it would be present in only of them.
@@ -328,12 +389,22 @@ void handleRemovalFromHeapTier(RemovalNotification<ICacheKey<K>, V> notification
         ICacheKey<K> key = notification.getKey();
         boolean wasEvicted = SPILLOVER_REMOVAL_REASONS.contains(notification.getRemovalReason());
         boolean countEvictionTowardsTotal = false; // Don't count this eviction towards the cache's total if it ends up in the disk tier
-        if (caches.get(diskCache).isEnabled() && wasEvicted && evaluatePolicies(notification.getValue())) {
+        boolean exceptionOccurredOnDiskCachePut = false;
+        boolean canCacheOnDisk = caches.get(diskCache).isEnabled() && wasEvicted && evaluatePolicies(notification.getValue());
+        if (canCacheOnDisk) {
             try (ReleasableLock ignore = writeLock.acquire()) {
                 diskCache.put(key, notification.getValue()); // spill over to the disk tier and increment its stats
+            } catch (Exception ex) {
+                // TODO: Catch specific exceptions. Needs better exception handling. We are just swallowing exception
+                // in this case as it shouldn't cause upstream request to fail.
+                logger.warn("Exception occurred while putting item to disk cache", ex);
+                exceptionOccurredOnDiskCachePut = true;
             }
-            updateStatsOnPut(TIER_DIMENSION_VALUE_DISK, key, notification.getValue());
-        } else {
+            if (!exceptionOccurredOnDiskCachePut) {
+                updateStatsOnPut(TIER_DIMENSION_VALUE_DISK, key, notification.getValue());
+            }
+        }
+        if (!canCacheOnDisk || exceptionOccurredOnDiskCachePut) {
             // If the value is not going to the disk cache, send this notification to the TSC's removal listener
             // as the value is leaving the TSC entirely
             removalListener.onRemoval(notification);