-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dex: instrument staking token pairs #5028
Comments
This was referenced Jan 30, 2025
erwanor
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2025
## Describe your changes Close #5028. ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes. - [x] If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: > Consensus and state breaking
conorsch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2025
## Describe your changes Close #5028. ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes. - [x] If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: > Consensus and state breaking
conorsch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2025
## Describe your changes Close #5028. ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes. - [x] If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: > Consensus and state breaking
conorsch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2025
## Describe your changes Close #5028. ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes. - [x] If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: > Consensus and state breaking
conorsch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2025
## Describe your changes Close #5028. ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes. - [x] If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: > Consensus and state breaking
conorsch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2025
## Describe your changes Close #5028. ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes. - [x] If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: > Consensus and state breaking
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: