Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial investigation into supporting a reactive content store #783

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 3, 2022

Conversation

paulcwarren
Copy link
Owner

@paulcwarren paulcwarren commented Feb 17, 2022

OK. This is probably a good stopping point for now. Implemented a ReactiveContentStore.

Spring Content REST does NOT yet support this. It is Java API only. But I'd like to get feedback on that before plugging it into the REST layer.

@paulcwarren paulcwarren marked this pull request as draft February 17, 2022 06:57
@paulcwarren paulcwarren changed the title Initial investiation into supporting a reactive content store Initial investigation into supporting a reactive content store Feb 24, 2022
- by having a separate ReactiveStoreImpl fragment.  This prevents NoClassDefFoundErrors on projects that dont use webflux
- for backward compatibility

private MappingContext mappingContext = new MappingContext(".", ".");

// reactive

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these can be removed. The whole class is reactive

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The mappingcontext? Or the comments?

- refactor/cleanup
@paulcwarren paulcwarren marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2022 05:45
@paulcwarren paulcwarren merged commit 257f365 into main Mar 3, 2022
@paulcwarren paulcwarren deleted the feature/reactive-stores branch March 3, 2022 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants