Fix jmh benchmark after #1309

[alancai98]

Description

JMH benchmark was using the old PartiQLParserBuilder.standard().build() to create the parser. Following #1309, JMH benchmark GH actions CI broke. Changed to use PartiQLParser.default().

Other Information

• Updated Unreleased Section in CHANGELOG: [NO]

  • No change to public api

• Any backward-incompatible changes? [NO]

• Any new external dependencies? [NO]

• Do your changes comply with the Contributing Guidelines
  and Code Style Guidelines? [YES]

License Information

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[github-actions]

Conformance comparison report

	Base (dafdac5)	36b8032	+/-
% Passing	92.54%	92.54%	0.00%
✅ Passing	5384	5384	0
❌ Failing	434	434	0
🔶 Ignored	0	0	0
Total Tests	5818	5818	0

Number passing in both: 5384

Number failing in both: 434

Number passing in Base (dafdac5) but now fail: 0

Number failing in Base (dafdac5) but now pass: 0

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (dafdac5) 72.16% compared to head (4b8ed48) 72.16%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1312   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     72.16%   72.16%           
  Complexity     2097     2097           
=========================================
  Files           221      221           
  Lines         15974    15974           
  Branches       2892     2892           
=========================================
  Hits          11528    11528           
  Misses         3640     3640           
  Partials        806      806           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CLI	11.86% <ø> (ø)
EXAMPLES	80.28% <ø> (ø)
LANG	80.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rchowell]

Thank you