-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add par_reduce_inner
functions
#1147
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ad7469a
Add par_reduce_inner functions
bprather 0beb947
Formatting, changelog
bprather de3c22f
Merge branch 'develop' into bprather/par-reduce-inner
bprather 15f6380
Merge branch 'develop' into bprather/par-reduce-inner
bprather b6d39c5
Be explicit that existing inner reductions are TeamThreadRange
bprather f7f5f97
Merge branch 'develop' into bprather/par-reduce-inner
pgrete File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should these be
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure. I didn't really think about it when dropping these in, and I don't think I fully understand the way loop pattern resolution is done anyway...
The way I understand it, since I use
TVR_INNER_LOOP
forThreadVectorRange
, these wouldn't resolve under that, right? So, we'd need a TVR and SIMD pattern for these too, if we wanted to make them selectable. Since these should be used pretty rarely, I don't know if the performance benefit of allowing customization is worth three implementations we're just going to stamp over with all the better general stuff you guys are writing for the next release.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could see it both ways. With my suggestion, you would have to call
parthenon::par_reduce_inner(inner_loop_pattern_ttr_tag, ...)
instead ofparthenon::par_reduce_inner(...)
, which would be more explicit that you aren't necessarily using the default inner loop pattern and conform to how the rest of thepar_*_inner
functions look. But this doesn't change anything about how this behaves.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, right, you can explicitly tag loops! It seems better to be explicit, then, let me give it a go today.