This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
default ws note #10014
default ws note #10014
Changes from 3 commits
85dda1d
28fa065
7daf30d
da1cdd0
77b8e4a
2aabcb3
7b6d2ff
569f634
9946d6a
82d56a9
163641b
c096841
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can;t we do something like
#[structopt(long = "ws-max-connections", value_name = "COUNT", default_value="100")]
?And get rid of
sc_rpc_server::WS_MAX_CONNECTION
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would also avoid the (likely) miss of the comment needing to be changed if this constant ever changed. grouped in the same lines here would be much easier to spot 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, using
default_value
doesn't work with using anOption<>
. So this change would have quite a bit of ripple effect.For now, I gues, the updated comment will have to do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What ripple effect?