You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great if that was a multi-arch image providing an linux/arm64 image. The reason is two-fold:
Lately, arm64 is gaining adoption. Running cloud instances in AWS on ARM is cheaper than Intel/AMD.
There are many people using macOS for development. While it does support running linux/amd64 using rosetta 2 translation layer, linux/arm64 is running full-speed (as much as it's possible with virtualization anyway).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…der (#2892)
* [Bridges] Move chain definitions to separate folder (#3822)
Related to
paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2538
This PR doesn't contain any functional changes.
The PR moves specific bridged chain definitions from
`bridges/primitives` to `bridges/chains` folder in order to facilitate
the migration of the `parity-bridges-repo` into `polkadot-sdk` as
discussed in https://hackmd.io/LprWjZ0bQXKpFeveYHIRXw?view
Apart from this it also includes some cosmetic changes to some
`Cargo.toml` files as a result of running `diener workspacify`.
(cherry picked from commit 0711729)
* diener workspacify
As of now, parity/polkadot image on docker hub is distributed as a linux/amd64 image. https://hub.docker.com/r/parity/polkadot/
It would be great if that was a multi-arch image providing an linux/arm64 image. The reason is two-fold:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: