Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use user installation of cssnano #1432

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 4, 2018
Merged

Use user installation of cssnano #1432

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 4, 2018

Conversation

fathyb
Copy link
Contributor

@fathyb fathyb commented May 24, 2018

Alternative to #1395, use local installation of cssnano.

Closes #1395.
Fixes #645.

@DeMoorJasper
Copy link
Member

Probably a better solution than updating to a beta version, I've closed my PR

@devongovett
Copy link
Member

Can we make it fall back to parcel's installation of cssnano? That way it won't force everyone to install cssnano locally, but they can override if needed.

@fathyb fathyb force-pushed the fix/use-local-cssnano branch from 0277a50 to 2544394 Compare July 3, 2018 19:14
@fathyb
Copy link
Contributor Author

fathyb commented Jul 3, 2018

@devongovett fixed!

@devongovett
Copy link
Member

heh, looks like cssnano v4 was just released: cssnano/cssnano@2463834

@devongovett devongovett merged commit 8cee316 into master Jul 4, 2018
@devongovett devongovett deleted the fix/use-local-cssnano branch July 4, 2018 20:29
@devongovett
Copy link
Member

merged since it is good to allow users to override the versions of things, but we should probably also just upgrade the default to v4 now that it's released.

@fathyb fathyb mentioned this pull request Jul 4, 2018
2zH pushed a commit to 2zH/parcel that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2018
devongovett pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
devongovett pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants