-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add get_in_memory_or_storage_by_block
to BlockchainProvider2
#11384
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6e21438
add get_in_memory_or_storage_by_block
joshieDo 422ad75
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into joshie/bblock
joshieDo 07f7be2
rm unused import
joshieDo a7c5e8e
fix history_by_block_hash
joshieDo 6249548
add to header and header_by_number
joshieDo ba276a5
add comment
joshieDo b594282
add comment
joshieDo 186646e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into joshie/bblock
joshieDo d794d1a
clippy
joshieDo 1b51a3e
add to transactions_by_block
joshieDo 6da5d50
dont convert to number where unnecessary
joshieDo 4cbf6cf
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into joshie/bblock
joshieDo da7badf
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into joshie/bblock
joshieDo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes me wonder if we should just have a method that does the:
part, and provide
by_block_hash
orby_block_num
methods so we don't have to go from number -> id -> match to number. same for hash -> id -> hashThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think those conversions should be perf-wise negligible, and it's worth imo having all logic in one single method
not that strongly opinated, if someone else would rather have
by_block_hash
andby_block_num
additions i'll add those cc @mattsseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah I think using the enum type here is fine, because some functions that need this feature accept NumHash themselves
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes sense