-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prevent collisions between attempts to materialize an immutable input digest. #15652
Merged
stuhood
merged 1 commit into
pantsbuild:main
from
stuhood:stuhood/immutable-inputs-cancellation
May 26, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm totally lost. How is this reproducible digest suffix any more anonymous than the tmpdir its being joined with?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The creation of the tempdir is guaranteed not to collide (via OS facilities, presumably), so each materialization attempt is in a fresh temporary directory. The digest suffix is a convenience for readability: it's the temp dir that is avoiding collisions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the LHS:
On the RHS - paraphrasing with an inline:
So the only change is to use the tempdir as-is instead of renaming it to a fixed
self.workdir.path().join(digest.hash.to_hex())
dest - Got it.Why was the self.workdir rooting important before and not now? Or was it never?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, so self.workdir is already a TempDir. So we create a TempDir in a TempDir, as we always did, but no longer rename from
<tmpdir>/<tmpdir>
-><tmpdir>/<digest>
we now just directly create<tmpdir>/<tmpdir>/<digest>
. It would seem the outer could just be a normal dir now, but that's only mildly confusing as is.