-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added FutureWarning to Series.str.__iter__ #29909
Added FutureWarning to Series.str.__iter__ #29909
Conversation
882f3c8
to
ab8c473
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why exactly do we need to deprecate this? I would simply fix the bug
ok i see the conversation and agree deprecation is ok. but this doesnt' fix the actual bug #28277 |
Yes, the bug isn't fixed by that, but @TomAugspurger suggested (in the issue) the expected behaviour should be to raise an exception:
So even though the bug isn't fixed immediately, in later versions, when this deprecation is taking effet, it will be resolved. Do you mean we should keep the issue open until then @jreback? |
3c76514
to
006e8b6
Compare
Resolved merge conflict and removed the "closes" tag from the PR description @jreback |
006e8b6
to
a9b7e2a
Compare
@SaturnFromTitan can you merge master |
a9b7e2a
to
61a2a06
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
CI is green @jreback |
great will look soon |
thanks @SaturnFromTitan |
series.str.cat(series.str)
is concatenating only the largest string #28277black pandas
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff