-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "Revert "MAINT: Remove Long and WidePanel (#15748)" (#15802)" #18341
Revert "Revert "MAINT: Remove Long and WidePanel (#15748)" (#15802)" #18341
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #18341 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.82% 91.83% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 153 153
Lines 49503 49495 -8
==========================================
- Hits 45458 45454 -4
+ Misses 4045 4041 -4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Let's still wait until there is an actual statsmodels release. At this point we don't know yet who of statsmodels or pandas will release first. |
going to merge #18333 which will causes this to fail. We weren't fully testing things in the downstream. |
@gfyoung go ahead and rebase. This should fail. We can decide whether to xfail the test at a later point. |
@jorisvandenbossche : That's unfortunate, as they said that it would come out by end of summer. Not sure what happened there.
@jreback : Not sure what "the test" is, but yep, will do. |
11e962b
to
6d89571
Compare
Ummm...@jreback : what test was supposed to fail? 😄 |
Well, that's the reality of volunteer-based open source. It's indeed a bit annoying for us to have to keep it, but also not that costly. |
Yeah...things happen. I have no problems waiting. |
IMO pandas should make this change since it provides incentive for statsmodels to drop a release. |
Then I agree with @bashtage we should xfail this test and merge. but let it fail to prove first. |
@gfyoung rebase and let's see |
6d89571
to
c2bed28
Compare
@jreback : Can confirm that Travis is failing as a result of your PR. I will |
@jreback : And adding |
@@ -2155,8 +2147,8 @@ def test_multiindex_get(self): | |||
assert (f1.items == [1, 2]).all() | |||
assert (f2.items == [1, 2]).all() | |||
|
|||
ind = MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 1), ('a', 2), ('b', 1)], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what does this last section compare?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not entirely sure? I just saw this variable being assigned and not being used afterwards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, if you can remove that (doesn't look like it does anything) would be great.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure thing. Done.
@TomAugspurger is there a statsmodel 0.9.0 release issue? (where we can reference this) |
705d08a
to
1a3c73a
Compare
@jreback : Judging from the milestone search here, statsmodels/statsmodels#3431 might be it? The issue is a little sparse though. |
I don't think so.
…On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Jeff Reback ***@***.***> wrote:
@TomAugspurger <https://github.com/tomaugspurger> is there a statsmodel
0.9.0 release issue? (where we can reference this)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#18341 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQHIkZCSs0hXhfTkq3XIHnWUVno3pdEks5s4Hf5gaJpZM4Qhvfg>
.
|
Still -1 on merging this. I would say let's try to convince them with words to do a release instead of by breaking their code. |
ok @gfyoung let's remove the xfail and just leave this PR until/when statsmodels can do a release. |
1a3c73a
to
69344c4
Compare
36b4866
to
b252049
Compare
c34fe91
to
4e1810a
Compare
3e5f43c
to
9bb6c82
Compare
77618bd
to
83ce112
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gfyoung I think can finally merge this as sm 0.9.0 is out.
doc/source/whatsnew/v0.23.0.txt
Outdated
@@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ Removal of prior version deprecations/changes | |||
so operations would continue to work. This is now fully removed, so a ``Resampler`` will no longer forward compat operations (:issue:`20554`) | |||
- Remove long deprecated ``axis=None`` parameter from ``.replace()`` (:issue:`20271`) | |||
|
|||
- The ``LongPanel`` and ``WidePanel`` classes have been removed (:issue:`10892`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
move to 0.24
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, will do. Finally! 😄
…andas-dev#15802)" This reverts commit 22f9d0d.
28edc49
to
854be64
Compare
@jreback : All is green here. |
Thanks! |
Sure thing. Hopefully we won't need to revert this revert 😄 |
The deprecating issue was #10892 |
With statsmodels/statsmodels#3580 now resolved, we can safely revert #15802