Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs-only] add storage architecture overview #1920

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Apr 30, 2021
Merged

Conversation

butonic
Copy link
Member

@butonic butonic commented Apr 14, 2021

This PR adds documentation to the storage service, with an overview diagram as well as terminology, trying to clarify how ocis / reva works.

butonic added 2 commits April 13, 2021 10:15
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@update-docs
Copy link

update-docs bot commented Apr 14, 2021

Thanks for opening this pull request! The maintainers of this repository would appreciate it if you would create a changelog item based on your changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@pascalwengerter pascalwengerter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Impressive work, just cought some typos and added some questions 🤘🏽

Co-authored-by: Pascal Wengerter <pwengerter@owncloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@butonic butonic force-pushed the document-architecture branch from 3f3d75d to 10ac494 Compare April 15, 2021 07:56
@butonic butonic requested a review from pascalwengerter April 15, 2021 08:31
Copy link
Contributor

@pascalwengerter pascalwengerter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good, excited for @dragotin's suggested changes!

Copy link
Contributor

@dragotin dragotin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some random thoughts that @butonic and me collected in discussions, for reference.

I guess this needs further refinement, we're not yet done ;-)

Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@butonic butonic requested a review from dragotin April 27, 2021 15:16
@butonic
Copy link
Member Author

butonic commented Apr 27, 2021

@dragotin @pascalwengerter I split up and simplfied some of the sections. I'd vote to get this in now and polish iteratively.

butonic added 2 commits April 27, 2021 15:17
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@butonic butonic force-pushed the document-architecture branch from 9692e78 to 205b3a7 Compare April 28, 2021 14:45
butonic added 4 commits April 28, 2021 14:45
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@micbar micbar requested a review from pascalwengerter April 29, 2021 15:21
butonic added 3 commits April 29, 2021 18:08
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Copy link
Contributor

@dragotin dragotin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok for the sake of progress :-)

@butonic butonic dismissed pascalwengerter’s stale review April 30, 2021 15:18

already incorporated

@butonic butonic merged commit 6826e57 into master Apr 30, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the document-architecture branch April 30, 2021 15:19
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2021
Merge: 46c60cc 6dfa4b2
Author: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Date:   Fri Apr 30 17:18:56 2021 +0200

    Merge pull request #1920 from owncloud/document-architecture

    [docs-only] add storage architecture overview
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants