Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add to background more on *why* C and C++ will keep existing #675

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor

This includes several citations.

This includes several citations.

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
david-a-wheeler and others added 2 commits October 23, 2024 11:38
Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
- Put monetary estimate into context of in terms of scale
- Fix linter warnings due to two adjacent references 

Signed-off-by: Thomas Nyman <thomas.nyman@ericsson.com>
@thomasnyman
Copy link
Contributor

Suggested some edits to improve readability in 90e2a74

Content-wise, I tried to put the monetary estimate into context of in terms of scale.

This also fix linter warnings due to two adjacent references. It appears this is a limitation in the linter rather than a real Markdown problem, but to work around that I've moved the reference to the The Register article to another sentence.

@thomasnyman thomasnyman merged commit 852e821 into main Oct 31, 2024
5 checks passed
@thomasnyman thomasnyman deleted the c_cpp_justification branch October 31, 2024 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants