Introduce a license finding score

[sschuberth]

Please have a look at the individual commit messages for the details.

[sschuberth]

Note that FossID does not seem to have the concept of a "score" to parse for.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5131 (5687fa8) into main (6566d29) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 94.11%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #5131      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.29%   72.29%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     1918     1918              
============================================
  Files           254      254              
  Lines         13627    13633       +6     
  Branches       1913     1914       +1     
============================================
+ Hits           9852     9856       +4     
- Misses         2775     2776       +1     
- Partials       1000     1001       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ain/kotlin/scanners/scanoss/ScanOssResultParser.kt	75.55% <66.66%> (-1.72%)	⬇️
scanner/src/main/kotlin/scanners/Askalono.kt	75.43% <100.00%> (ø)
scanner/src/main/kotlin/scanners/BoyterLc.kt	79.03% <100.00%> (+0.34%)	⬆️
scanner/src/main/kotlin/scanners/Licensee.kt	84.78% <100.00%> (+0.33%)	⬆️
...n/kotlin/scanners/scancode/ScanCodeResultParser.kt	93.37% <100.00%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
.../curation/ClearlyDefinedPackageCurationProvider.kt	60.93% <0.00%> (-3.13%)	⬇️
downloader/src/main/kotlin/vcs/Subversion.kt	68.53% <0.00%> (+0.69%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6566d29...5687fa8. Read the comment docs.

[mnonnenmacher]

Adding a test for the score to AbstractScannerFunTest would be nice.

[sschuberth]

Adding a test for the score to AbstractScannerFunTest would be nice.

I'll look into that separately as that requires some refactoring.

[sschuberth]

Adding a test for the score to AbstractScannerFunTest would be nice.

I'll look into that separately as that requires some refactoring.

See #5133.